On 05-01-21, 17:56, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Add qpic_nand node to support QPIC NAND controller on SDX55 platform.
> Since there is no "aon" clock in SDX55, a dummy clock is provided.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasi...@linaro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-sdx55.dtsi | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-sdx55.dtsi 
> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-sdx55.dtsi
> index 1b9b990ad0a2..1a6947753972 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-sdx55.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-sdx55.dtsi
> @@ -41,6 +41,12 @@ pll_test_clk: pll-test-clk {
>                       #clock-cells = <0>;
>                       clock-frequency = <400000000>;
>               };
> +
> +             nand_clk_dummy: nand-clk-dummy {

Why dummy..? 
> +                     compatible = "fixed-clock";
> +                     #clock-cells = <0>;
> +                     clock-frequency = <32000>;

Is this sleep clock of platform..?

> +             };
>       };
>  
>       cpus {
> @@ -178,6 +184,22 @@ qpic_bam: dma@1b04000 {
>                       status = "disabled";
>               };
>  
> +             qpic_nand: nand@1b30000 {
> +                     compatible = "qcom,sdx55-nand";
> +                     reg = <0x01b30000 0x10000>;
> +                     #address-cells = <1>;
> +                     #size-cells = <0>;
> +                     clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_QPIC_CLK>,
> +                              <&nand_clk_dummy>;
> +                     clock-names = "core", "aon";
> +
> +                     dmas = <&qpic_bam 0>,
> +                            <&qpic_bam 1>,
> +                            <&qpic_bam 2>;
> +                     dma-names = "tx", "rx", "cmd";
> +                     status = "disabled";
> +             };
> +
>               tcsr_mutex_block: syscon@1f40000 {
>                       compatible = "syscon";
>                       reg = <0x1f40000 0x20000>;
> -- 
> 2.25.1

-- 
~Vinod

Reply via email to