On Thu, 31 Dec 2020 17:09:23 +0100 Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 11:12:05PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > @@ -467,8 +489,8 @@ static int arch_copy_kprobe(struct kprobe *p) > > */ > > len = prepare_boost(buf, p, &insn); > > > > - /* Check whether the instruction modifies Interrupt Flag or not */ > > - p->ainsn.if_modifier = is_IF_modifier(buf); > > + /* Analyze the opcode and set resume flags */ > > + set_resume_flags(p, &insn); > > So this function wants to be called something like analyze_insn() or so > then? set_resume_flags() is kinda misleading as a name. Hrm, I meant setting the flags used in the resume_execution() afterwards. Since the instruction itself (not only opcode but also oprands) was also analyzed in other places, so I like the set_resume_flags() for it. Thank you, -- Masami Hiramatsu <mhira...@kernel.org>