Hi Stephen,
On 15-12-20, 06:58, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 14:29:15 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au>
> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the dmaengine tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > drivers/dma/idxd/submit.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 8326be9f1c0b ("dmaengine: idxd: fix mapping of portal size")
> >
> > from the dmaengine-fixes tree and commit:
> >
> > 8e50d392652f ("dmaengine: idxd: Add shared workqueue support")
> >
> > from the dmaengine tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
> >
> > diff --cc drivers/dma/idxd/submit.c
> > index 417048e3c42a,efca5d8468a6..000000000000
> > --- a/drivers/dma/idxd/submit.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma/idxd/submit.c
> > @@@ -74,14 -86,27 +86,27 @@@ int idxd_submit_desc(struct idxd_wq *wq
> > if (idxd->state != IDXD_DEV_ENABLED)
> > return -EIO;
> >
> > - portal = wq->dportal;
> > - portal = wq->portal + idxd_get_wq_portal_offset(IDXD_PORTAL_LIMITED);
> > ++ portal = wq->portal;
> > +
> > /*
> > - * The wmb() flushes writes to coherent DMA data before possibly
> > - * triggering a DMA read. The wmb() is necessary even on UP because
> > - * the recipient is a device.
> > + * The wmb() flushes writes to coherent DMA data before
> > + * possibly triggering a DMA read. The wmb() is necessary
> > + * even on UP because the recipient is a device.
> > */
> > wmb();
> > - iosubmit_cmds512(portal, desc->hw, 1);
> > + if (wq_dedicated(wq)) {
> > + iosubmit_cmds512(portal, desc->hw, 1);
> > + } else {
> > + /*
> > + * It's not likely that we would receive queue full rejection
> > + * since the descriptor allocation gates at wq size. If we
> > + * receive a -EAGAIN, that means something went wrong such as
> > the
> > + * device is not accepting descriptor at all.
> > + */
> > + rc = enqcmds(portal, desc->hw);
> > + if (rc < 0)
> > + return rc;
> > + }
> >
> > /*
> > * Pending the descriptor to the lockless list for the irq_entry
>
> Just a reminder that this conflict still exists. Commit 8326be9f1c0b
> is now in Linus' tree.
Thanks for the reminder. Since Linus like to see the conflicts, I am
going to send this as is and let him resolve it :)
--
~Vinod
