On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 12:20:19PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote: > (Adding Ingo to CC regarding kernel/lockdep_proc.c..) > That seems to be an accurate asessment, yes. If do_div(s64, ...) is buggy > behaviour, then the current check is fine, and the callsites should be > corrected. Though if there's code in-tree that relies on s64 do_div, that > seems > to be a more problematic issue.
It is a bug and the only existing callers that manage to work are those that make sure that signed value is positive. Still asking for trouble... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
