El Wed, 12 Dec 2007 01:16:06 +0100 Rene Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> On 12-12-07 01:09, Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote: [...] > > Great, thanks much for reporting. Sort of interesting in itself that without > -O2 you do still get correct results on 64-bit but for some other time. > > You're the first one to go significantly below 1 us it seems. :( I have seen the other msg and i have to say that the tests where done at 1GHz not at full speed. At full speed i see cycles: out 3025, in 1653 cycles: out 3040, in 1708 cycles: out 3044, in 1650 cycles: out 3034, in 1652 cycles: out 3035, in 1652 cycles: out 3037, in 1652 cycles: out 3043, in 1709 cycles: out 3032, in 1648 cycles: out 3039, in 1652 cycles: out 3041, in 1652 cycles: out 3048, in 1704 cycles: out 3040, in 1650 cycles: out 3023, in 1631 cycles: out 3036, in 1652 cycles: out 3042, in 1706 cycles: out 3047, in 1708 cycles: out 3047, in 1711 cycles: out 3036, in 1652 > > Rene. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
