On 11/16/20 5:25 PM, matthew.gerl...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerl...@linux.intel.com>
>
> A DFL may not begin at offset 0 of BAR 0. A PCIe vendor
> specific capability can be used to specify the start of a
> number of DFLs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerl...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> Documentation/fpga/dfl.rst | 10 +++++
> drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/fpga/dfl.rst b/Documentation/fpga/dfl.rst
> index 0404fe6ffc74..c81ceb1e79e2 100644
> --- a/Documentation/fpga/dfl.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/fpga/dfl.rst
> @@ -501,6 +501,16 @@ Developer only needs to provide a sub feature driver
> with matched feature id.
> FME Partial Reconfiguration Sub Feature driver (see
> drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-pr.c)
> could be a reference.
>
> +Location of DFLs on PCI bus
> +===========================
> +The start of the DFL is assumed to be offset 0 of bar 0.
> +Alternatively, a vendor specific capability structure can be used to
> +specify the location of one or more DFLs. Intel has reserved the
> +vendor specific id of 0x43 for this purpose. The vendor specific
> +data begins with a 4 byte count of the number of DFLs followed 4 byte
> +Offset/BIR fields for each DFL. Bits 2:0 of Offset/BIR field indicates
> +the BAR, and bits 31:3 form the 8 byte aligned offset where bits 2:0 are
> +zero.
>
Does the 'Device Feature List (DFL) Overview' section need to change ?
Maybe some more ascii art on location of bar0 vs vendor specific ?
> Open discussion
> ===============
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c
> index b1b157b41942..5418e8bf2496 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,13 @@
> #define DRV_VERSION "0.8"
Since basic pci functionality is changing, consider incrementing this version.
> #define DRV_NAME "dfl-pci"
>
> +#define PCI_VNDR_ID_DFLS 0x43
> +
> +#define PCI_VNDR_DFLS_CNT_OFFSET 8
> +#define PCI_VNDR_DFLS_RES_OFFSET 0x0c
> +
> +#define PCI_VND_DFLS_RES_BAR_MASK 0x7
Is this missing a R? PCI_VNDR_DFLS_RES_BAR_MASK ?
> +
> struct cci_drvdata {
> struct dfl_fpga_cdev *cdev; /* container device */
> };
> @@ -119,6 +126,82 @@ static int *cci_pci_create_irq_table(struct pci_dev
> *pcidev, unsigned int nvec)
> return table;
> }
>
> +static int find_dfl_in_cfg(struct pci_dev *pcidev,
> + struct dfl_fpga_enum_info *info)
> +{
> + u32 bar, offset, vndr_hdr, dfl_cnt, dfl_res;
> + int dfl_res_off, i, voff = 0;
> + resource_size_t start, len;
> +
> + while ((voff = pci_find_next_ext_capability(pcidev, voff,
> PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_VNDR))) {
> +
extra nl
> + pci_read_config_dword(pcidev, voff + PCI_VNDR_HEADER,
> &vndr_hdr);
A general problem.
Return of pci_read is not checked, nor are the values ex/ vndr_hdr initialized.
> +
> + dev_dbg(&pcidev->dev,
> + "vendor-specific capability id 0x%x, rev 0x%x len
> 0x%x\n",
> + PCI_VNDR_HEADER_ID(vndr_hdr),
> + PCI_VNDR_HEADER_REV(vndr_hdr),
> + PCI_VNDR_HEADER_LEN(vndr_hdr));
> +
> + if (PCI_VNDR_HEADER_ID(vndr_hdr) == PCI_VNDR_ID_DFLS)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (!voff) {
> + dev_dbg(&pcidev->dev, "%s no VSEC found\n", __func__);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + pci_read_config_dword(pcidev, voff + PCI_VNDR_DFLS_CNT_OFFSET,
> &dfl_cnt);
> + dev_info(&pcidev->dev, "dfl_cnt %d\n", dfl_cnt);
> + for (i = 0; i < dfl_cnt; i++) {
Is there a upper limit on the dfl_cnt ? maybe PCI_STD_NUM_BARS ?
> + dfl_res_off = voff + PCI_VNDR_DFLS_RES_OFFSET +
> + (i * sizeof(dfl_res));
> + pci_read_config_dword(pcidev, dfl_res_off, &dfl_res);
> +
> + dev_dbg(&pcidev->dev, "dfl_res 0x%x\n", dfl_res);
> +
> + bar = dfl_res & PCI_VND_DFLS_RES_BAR_MASK;
an extra nl, fix the similar ones as well.
> +
> + if (bar >= PCI_STD_NUM_BARS) {
> + dev_err(&pcidev->dev, "%s bad bar number %d\n",
> + __func__, bar);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + len = pci_resource_len(pcidev, bar);
> +
> + if (len == 0) {
> + dev_err(&pcidev->dev, "%s unmapped bar number %d\n",
> + __func__, bar);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + offset = dfl_res & ~PCI_VND_DFLS_RES_BAR_MASK;
> +
> + if (offset >= len) {
> + dev_err(&pcidev->dev, "%s bad offset %u >= %llu\n",
> + __func__, offset, len);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + dev_info(&pcidev->dev, "%s BAR %d offset 0x%x\n", __func__,
> bar, offset);
> +
> + start = pci_resource_start(pcidev, bar) + offset;
> + len -= offset;
> +
> + if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(start)) {
> + dev_err(&pcidev->dev, "%s unaliged start 0x%llx\n",
> + __func__, start);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + dfl_fpga_enum_info_add_dfl(info, start, len);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int find_dfl_in_bar0(struct pci_dev *pcidev,
> struct dfl_fpga_enum_info *info)
> {
> @@ -221,7 +304,10 @@ static int cci_enumerate_feature_devs(struct pci_dev
> *pcidev)
> goto irq_free_exit;
> }
>
> - ret = find_dfl_in_bar0(pcidev, info);
> + ret = find_dfl_in_cfg(pcidev, info);
> +
> + if (ret)
> + ret = find_dfl_in_bar0(pcidev, info);
Is this really an either/or ?
Could there be a base functionality on bar0 and a skew functionality on vendor
bars?
If vendor is going to completely override, why not use bar0 ?
Tom
>
> if (ret)
> goto irq_free_exit;
