This patch fixes the following:
- Uses __func__ macro to print function names.
- Got rid of unnecessary braces around single line if statements.
- End of block comments on a seperate line.
- A spelling mistake of the word "on".
Signed-off-by: Tabot Kevin <tabot.ke...@gmail.com>
---
drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2680.c | 25 +++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2680.c
b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2680.c
index c907305..1396a33 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2680.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2680.c
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ static int ov2680_g_bin_factor_x(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
s32 *val)
struct ov2680_device *dev = to_ov2680_sensor(sd);
struct i2c_client *client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(sd);
- dev_dbg(&client->dev, "++++ov2680_g_bin_factor_x\n");
+ dev_dbg(&client->dev, "++++%s\n", __func__);
*val = ov2680_res[dev->fmt_idx].bin_factor_x;
return 0;
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ static int ov2680_g_bin_factor_y(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
s32 *val)
struct i2c_client *client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(sd);
*val = ov2680_res[dev->fmt_idx].bin_factor_y;
- dev_dbg(&client->dev, "++++ov2680_g_bin_factor_y\n");
+ dev_dbg(&client->dev, "++++%s\n", __func__);
return 0;
}
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ static int ov2680_get_intg_factor(struct i2c_client *client,
u16 reg_val;
int ret;
- dev_dbg(&client->dev, "++++ov2680_get_intg_factor\n");
+ dev_dbg(&client->dev, "++++%s\n", __func__);
if (!info)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -251,8 +251,8 @@ static long __ov2680_set_exposure(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
int coarse_itg,
int ret, exp_val;
dev_dbg(&client->dev,
- "+++++++__ov2680_set_exposure coarse_itg %d, gain %d, digitgain
%d++\n",
- coarse_itg, gain, digitgain);
+ "+++++++%s coarse_itg %d, gain %d, digitgain %d++\n",
+ __func__, coarse_itg, gain, digitgain);
vts = ov2680_res[dev->fmt_idx].lines_per_frame;
@@ -461,11 +461,11 @@ static int ov2680_v_flip(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, s32
value)
ret = ov2680_read_reg(client, 1, OV2680_FLIP_REG, &val);
if (ret)
return ret;
- if (value) {
+ if (value)
val |= OV2680_FLIP_MIRROR_BIT_ENABLE;
- } else {
+ else
val &= ~OV2680_FLIP_MIRROR_BIT_ENABLE;
- }
+
ret = ov2680_write_reg(client, 1,
OV2680_FLIP_REG, val);
if (ret)
@@ -731,7 +731,8 @@ static int gpio_ctrl(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, bool flag)
* existing integrations often wire two (reset/power_down)
* because that is the way other sensors work. There is no
* way to tell how it is wired internally, so existing
- * firmwares expose both and we drive them symmetrically. */
+ * firmwares expose both and we drive them symmetrically.
+ */
if (flag) {
ret = dev->platform_data->gpio0_ctrl(sd, 1);
usleep_range(10000, 15000);
@@ -1060,9 +1061,9 @@ static int ov2680_s_stream(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, int
enable)
mutex_lock(&dev->input_lock);
if (enable)
- dev_dbg(&client->dev, "ov2680_s_stream one\n");
+ dev_dbg(&client->dev, "%s on\n", __func__);
else
- dev_dbg(&client->dev, "ov2680_s_stream off\n");
+ dev_dbg(&client->dev, "%s off\n", __func__);
ret = ov2680_write_reg(client, 1, OV2680_SW_STREAM,
enable ? OV2680_START_STREAMING :
@@ -1226,7 +1227,7 @@ static int ov2680_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
struct v4l2_subdev *sd = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
struct ov2680_device *dev = to_ov2680_sensor(sd);
- dev_dbg(&client->dev, "ov2680_remove...\n");
+ dev_dbg(&client->dev, "%s...\n", __func__);
dev->platform_data->csi_cfg(sd, 0);
--
2.7.4
