On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 12:06:41PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > From: Ahmed S. Darwish <a.darw...@linutronix.de> > > The usage of in_interrupt() in drivers is phased out for various reasons. > > Various comments use !in_interrupt() to describe calling context for > functions which might sleep. That's wrong because the calling context has > to be preemptible task context, which is not what !in_interrupt() > describes. > > Replace !in_interrupt() with more accurate plain text descriptions. > > The comment for usb_hcd_poll_rh_status() is misleading as this function is > called from all kinds of contexts including preemptible task > context. Remove it as there is obviously no restriction. > > Signed-off-by: Ahmed S. Darwish <a.darw...@linutronix.de> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bige...@linutronix.de> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> > Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org > --- > V2: Fixup the comments according to review (Alan) > --- > drivers/usb/core/buffer.c | 6 ++++-- > drivers/usb/core/hcd-pci.c | 6 ++++-- > drivers/usb/core/hcd.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++--------- > drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 3 ++- > drivers/usb/core/message.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------- > drivers/usb/core/usb.c | 4 ++-- > 6 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Alan Stern <st...@rowland.harvard.edu>
