On 2020-10-04 23:22 +0800, Coiby Xu wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 02:53:48PM +0900, Benjamin Poirier wrote:
> > On 2020-10-03 07:59 +0800, Coiby Xu wrote:
> > > This fixes commit 0107635e15ac
> > > ("staging: qlge: replace pr_err with netdev_err") which introduced an
> > > build breakage of missing `struct ql_adapter *qdev` for some functions
> > > and a warning of type mismatch with dumping enabled, i.e.,
> > > 
> > > $ make CFLAGS_MODULE="-DQL_ALL_DUMP -DQL_OB_DUMP -DQL_CB_DUMP \
> > >     -DQL_IB_DUMP -DQL_REG_DUMP -DQL_DEV_DUMP" M=drivers/staging/qlge
> > > 
> > > qlge_dbg.c: In function ‘ql_dump_ob_mac_rsp’:
> > > qlge_dbg.c:2051:13: error: ‘qdev’ undeclared (first use in this 
> > > function); did you mean ‘cdev’?
> > >  2051 |  netdev_err(qdev->ndev, "%s\n", __func__);
> > >       |             ^~~~
> > > qlge_dbg.c: In function ‘ql_dump_routing_entries’:
> > > qlge_dbg.c:1435:10: warning: format ‘%s’ expects argument of type ‘char 
> > > *’, but argument 3 has type ‘int’ [-Wformat=]
> > >  1435 |        "%s: Routing Mask %d = 0x%.08x\n",
> > >       |         ~^
> > >       |          |
> > >       |          char *
> > >       |         %d
> > >  1436 |        i, value);
> > >       |        ~
> > >       |        |
> > >       |        int
> > > qlge_dbg.c:1435:37: warning: format ‘%x’ expects a matching ‘unsigned 
> > > int’ argument [-Wformat=]
> > >  1435 |        "%s: Routing Mask %d = 0x%.08x\n",
> > >       |                                 ~~~~^
> > >       |                                     |
> > >       |                                     unsigned int
> > > 
> > > Note that now ql_dump_rx_ring/ql_dump_tx_ring won't check if the passed
> > > parameter is a null pointer.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 0107635e15ac ("staging: qlge: replace pr_err with netdev_err")
> > > Reported-by: Benjamin Poirier <benjamin.poir...@gmail.com>
> > > Suggested-by: Benjamin Poirier <benjamin.poir...@gmail.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Coiby Xu <coiby...@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Benjamin Poirier <benjamin.poir...@gmail.com>
> 
> Thank you! Btw, I guess when this patch is picked, the "Reviewed-by" tag
> will also be included. So I needn't to send another patch, am I right?

I think so. Maintainers usually take care of adding attribution tags
from followup emails and that's what Greg has done for your previous
qlge patch it looks like.

Reply via email to