Oleg Nesterov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On 11/19, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> 
>> So to fix the problem this patch modifies next_tgid() to return
>> both a tgid and the task struct in question.
>> 
>> A structure is introduced to return these values because it is
>> slightly cleaner and easier to optimize, and the resulting code
>> is a little shorter.
>
> Nice. Perhaps we can also factor out the incrementing of iter.tgid? Lessens
> the generated code, and (imho) cleanups the source a little bit.

Well the name doesn't imply what the exact sematic is and we
only have one caller, so we might as well.  Looking at the
code I don't see any problems.

Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> (untested, 2.6.24-rc2-mm1 doesn't boot on my machine)
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> --- PT/fs/proc/base.c~        2007-11-20 19:00:05.000000000 +0300
> +++ PT/fs/proc/base.c 2007-11-20 19:06:28.000000000 +0300
> @@ -2378,6 +2378,7 @@ static struct tgid_iter next_tgid(struct
>       rcu_read_lock();
>  retry:
>       iter.task = NULL;
> +     iter.tgid++;
>       pid = find_ge_pid(iter.tgid, ns);
>       if (pid) {
>               iter.tgid = pid_nr_ns(pid, ns);
> @@ -2394,10 +2395,8 @@ retry:
>                * found doesn't happen to be a thread group leader.
>                * As we don't care in the case of readdir.
>                */
> -             if (!iter.task || !has_group_leader_pid(iter.task)) {
> -                     iter.tgid += 1;
> +             if (!iter.task || !has_group_leader_pid(iter.task))
>                       goto retry;
> -             }
>               get_task_struct(iter.task);
>       }
>       rcu_read_unlock();
> @@ -2434,10 +2433,8 @@ int proc_pid_readdir(struct file * filp,
>  
>       ns = filp->f_dentry->d_sb->s_fs_info;
>       iter.task = NULL;
> -     iter.tgid = filp->f_pos - TGID_OFFSET;
> -     for (iter = next_tgid(ns, iter);
> -          iter.task;
> -          iter.tgid += 1, iter = next_tgid(ns, iter)) {
> +     iter.tgid = filp->f_pos - TGID_OFFSET - 1;
> +     while ((iter = next_tgid(ns, iter)).task) {
>               filp->f_pos = iter.tgid + TGID_OFFSET;
>               if (proc_pid_fill_cache(filp, dirent, filldir, iter) < 0) {
>                       put_task_struct(iter.task);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to