Oleg Nesterov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 11/19, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> >> I think we can solve the immediate issues cleanly >> without it, and we are pretty much in bug fixing territory now. > > Yes sure. Besides, the "patch" I showed for illustration is not complete, > and it is not easy to solve the problems with exec(). > > Could you re-send your patch with changelog to Andrew? I agree, it is better > to pass a pointer than to add the horrible hack to proc_pid_readdir().
Definitely. I'm just testing now to make certain my code actually works. I have respun my patch to return a structure as I figured out how to do that cleanly. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
