From: Ulrich Drepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 01:53:14 -0500
FWIW, I think this indirect syscall stuff is the most ugly interface I've ever seen proposed for the kernel. And I agree with all of the objections raised by both H. Pater Anvin and Eric Dumazet. > This patch adds support for setting the O_NONBLOCK flag of the file > descriptors returned by socket, socketpair, and accept. ... > - err = sock_attach_fd(sock1, newfile1); > + err = sock_attach_fd(sock1, newfile1, > + INDIRECT_PARAM(file_flags, flags)); Where does this INDIRECT_PARAM() macro get defined? I do not see it being defined anywhere in these patches. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
