On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 16:30 +0200, pet...@infradead.org wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:48:17PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > I think this happened because seqcount_##lockname##_init() is defined at
> > function rather than macro, so when the seqcount_init() gets expand in
> 
> Bah! I hate all this :/
> 
> I suspect the below, while more verbose than I'd like is the best
> option.

Stephen, can you add this patch for now until Peter beats you to it?

> 
> ---
>  include/linux/seqlock.h | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/seqlock.h b/include/linux/seqlock.h
> index f73c7eb68f27..76e44e6c0100 100644
> --- a/include/linux/seqlock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/seqlock.h
> @@ -173,6 +173,19 @@ static inline void seqcount_lockdep_reader_access(const
> seqcount_t *s)
>   * @lock:    Pointer to the associated lock
>   */
>  
> +#define seqcount_LOCKNAME_init(s, _lock, lockname)                   \
> +     do {                                                            \
> +             seqcount_##lockname##_t *____s = (s);                   \
> +             seqcount_init(&____s->seqcount);                        \
> +             __SEQ_LOCK(____s->lock = (_lock));                      \
> +     } while (0)
> +
> +#define seqcount_raw_spinlock_init(s, lock)  seqcount_LOCKNAME_init(s, lock,
> raw_spinlock)
> +#define seqcount_spinlock_init(s, lock)              seqcount_LOCKNAME_init(s
> , lock, spinlock)
> +#define seqcount_rwlock_init(s, lock)                seqcount_LOCKNAME_init(s
> , lock, rwlock);
> +#define seqcount_mutex_init(s, lock)         seqcount_LOCKNAME_init(s, lock,
> mutex);
> +#define seqcount_ww_mutex_init(s, lock)              seqcount_LOCKNAME_init(s
> , lock, ww_mutex);
> +
>  /*
>   * SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME()       - Instantiate seqcount_LOCKNAME_t and helpers
>   * seqprop_LOCKNAME_*()      - Property accessors for seqcount_LOCKNAME_t
> @@ -190,13 +203,6 @@ typedef struct seqcount_##lockname {                     
>         
>       \
>       __SEQ_LOCK(locktype     *lock);                                 \
>  } seqcount_##lockname##_t;                                           \
>                                                                       \
> -static __always_inline void                                          \
> -seqcount_##lockname##_init(seqcount_##lockname##_t *s, locktype *lock)       
> \
> -{                                                                    \
> -     seqcount_init(&s->seqcount);                                    \
> -     __SEQ_LOCK(s->lock = lock);                                     \
> -}                                                                    \
> -                                                                     \
>  static __always_inline seqcount_t *                                  \
>  __seqprop_##lockname##_ptr(seqcount_##lockname##_t *s)                       
> \
>  {                                                                    \
> @@ -284,8 +290,8 @@ SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(ww_mutex,     struct ww_mutex,
> true,     &s->lock->base, ww_mu
>       __SEQ_LOCK(.lock        = (assoc_lock))                         \
>  }
>  
> -#define SEQCNT_SPINLOCK_ZERO(name, lock)     SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME_ZERO(name,
> lock)
>  #define SEQCNT_RAW_SPINLOCK_ZERO(name, lock) SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME_ZERO(name,
> lock)
> +#define SEQCNT_SPINLOCK_ZERO(name, lock)     SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME_ZERO(name,
> lock)
>  #define SEQCNT_RWLOCK_ZERO(name, lock)               SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME_ZERO(n
> ame, lock)
>  #define SEQCNT_MUTEX_ZERO(name, lock)                SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME_ZERO(n
> ame, lock)
>  #define SEQCNT_WW_MUTEX_ZERO(name, lock)     SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME_ZERO(name,
> lock)
> 

Reply via email to