On Tue, Sep 08 2020 at 12:05, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 2:54 AM Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote:
>> Right and that's where we want the new chip flag with the unmask if
>> armed.
>
> OK, so we're back in Maulik's court to spin, right? I think the last
> word before our tangent was at:
>
> http://lore.kernel.org/r/87y2m1vhkm....@nanos.tec.linutronix.de
>
> There you were leaning towards #2 ("a new function
> disable_wakeup_irq_for_suspend()"). Presumably you'd now be
> suggesting #1 ("Do the symmetric thing") since I've pointed out the
> bunch of drivers that would need to change.
Yes #1 is what we need.
Thanks,
tglx
