On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 11:26:00AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 11:24 AM Kent Gibson <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 09:35:36PM +0800, Kent Gibson wrote:
> > > Add support for requesting lines using the GPIO_V2_GET_LINE_IOCTL, and
> > > returning their current values using GPIO_V2_LINE_GET_VALUES_IOCTL.
> > >
> > > The struct linereq implementation is based on the v1 struct linehandle
> > > implementation.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Kent Gibson <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > >
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > >               if (copy_from_user(&offset, ip, sizeof(offset)))
> > >                       return -EFAULT;
> > > @@ -1104,6 +1505,25 @@ int gpiolib_cdev_register(struct gpio_device 
> > > *gdev, dev_t devt)
> > >                MAJOR(devt), gdev->id);
> > >
> > >       return 0;
> > > +     /*
> > > +      * array sizes must ensure 64-bit alignment and not create holes in
> > > +      * the struct packing.
> > > +      */
> > > +     BUILD_BUG_ON(IS_ALIGNED(GPIO_V2_LINES_MAX, 2));
> > > +     BUILD_BUG_ON(IS_ALIGNED(GPIO_MAX_NAME_SIZE, 8));
> > > +
> > > +     /*
> > > +      * check that uAPI structs are 64-bit aligned for 32/64-bit
> > > +      * compatibility
> > > +      */
> > > +     BUILD_BUG_ON(IS_ALIGNED(sizeof(struct gpio_v2_line_attribute), 8));
> > > +     BUILD_BUG_ON(IS_ALIGNED(sizeof(struct 
> > > gpio_v2_line_config_attribute), 8));
> > > +     BUILD_BUG_ON(IS_ALIGNED(sizeof(struct gpio_v2_line_config), 8));
> > > +     BUILD_BUG_ON(IS_ALIGNED(sizeof(struct gpio_v2_line_request), 8));
> > > +     BUILD_BUG_ON(IS_ALIGNED(sizeof(struct gpio_v2_line_info), 8));
> > > +     BUILD_BUG_ON(IS_ALIGNED(sizeof(struct gpio_v2_line_info_changed), 
> > > 8));
> > > +     BUILD_BUG_ON(IS_ALIGNED(sizeof(struct gpio_v2_line_event), 8));
> > > +     BUILD_BUG_ON(IS_ALIGNED(sizeof(struct gpio_v2_line_values), 8));
> > >  }
> > >
> >
> > A couple of things here - these should all be !IS_ALIGNED.
> > And the BUILD_BUG_ON gets compiled out, and so doesn't fail, if they are
> > after the return.
> >
> > How would you like that fixed - v8 or a patch once v7 is in?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Kent.
> 
> v8 please. Why is it compiled out though? Does it need some config option?
> 

Not sure - haven't looked into it.  I only noticed the condition was
inverted in passing, and when I flipped it it still compiled.
Moving the return to the end of the function made them all fail,
as they should if IS_ALIGNED is true.

Having BUILD_BUG_ON being able to compile out quietly is a problem in
itself.  Nothing special in my setup that I am aware of.

Cheers,
Kent.

Reply via email to