On Wednesday 14 November 2007 22:10, David Miller wrote:
> From: Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:27:39 +1100
>
> > OK, in vanilla kernels, the page allocator definitely shows higher
> > in the results (than with Herbert's patch reverted).
>
> ...
>
> > I can't see that these numbers show much useful, unfortunately.
>
> Thanks for all of this data Nick.
>
> So the thing that's being effected here in TCP is
> net/ipv4/tcp.c:select_size(), specifically the else branch:
>
> int tmp = tp->mss_cache;
> ...
> else {
> int pgbreak = SKB_MAX_HEAD(MAX_TCP_HEADER);
>
> if (tmp >= pgbreak &&
> tmp <= pgbreak + (MAX_SKB_FRAGS - 1) * PAGE_SIZE)
> tmp = pgbreak;
> }
>
> This is deciding, in 'tmp', how much linear sk_buff space to
> allocate. 'tmp' is initially set to the path MSS, which
> for loopback is 16K - the space necessary for packet headers.
>
> The SKB_MAX_HEAD() value has changed as a result of Herbert's
> bug fix. I suspect this 'if' test is passing both with and
> without the patch.
>
> But pgbreak is now smaller, and thus the skb->data linear
> data area size we choose to use is smaller as well.
OK, that makes sense. BTW, are you taking advantage of kmalloc's
"quantization" into slabs WRT the linear data area? I wonder if
it would be at all useful...
> You can test if this is precisely what is causing the performance
> regression by using the old calculation just here in select_size().
>
> Add something like this local to net/ipv4/tcp.c:
>
> #define OLD_SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(X) \
> (((X) - sizeof(struct skb_shared_info)) & \
> ~(SMP_CACHE_BYTES - 1))
> #define OLD_SKB_MAX_ORDER(X, ORDER) \
> OLD_SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD((PAGE_SIZE << (ORDER)) - (X))
> #define OLD_SKB_MAX_HEAD(X) (OLD_SKB_MAX_ORDER((X), 0))
>
> And then use OLD_SKB_MAX_HEAD() in select_size().
That brings performance back up!
I wonder why it isn't causing a problem for SLAB...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
