On 02/09/2020 17:43, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 09:29:31AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 9/2/20 9:23 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>>> A few months ago, commit e132fc6bb89b ("power: supply: charger-manager:
>>> Make decisions focussed on battery status")
>>> changed the expression in the if statement from "duration >
>>> desc->discharging_max_duration_ms"
>>> to "duration > desc->charging_max_duration_ms", but the arguments for
>>> dev_info() were left unchanged.
>>> Apparently, due to a copy-paste error.
>>>
>>> Fix this by using the proper arguments for dev_info().
>>>
>>> Also, while there, replace "exceed" with "exceeds", for both messages.
>>>
>>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1496803 ("Copy-paste error")
>>> Fixes: e132fc6bb89b ("power: supply: charger-manager: Make decisions
>>> focussed on battery status")
>>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo...@kernel.org>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - Replace "exceed" with "exceeds"
>>>
>>> drivers/power/supply/charger-manager.c | 6 +++---
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/charger-manager.c
>>> b/drivers/power/supply/charger-manager.c
>>> index 07992821e252..a6d5dbd55e37 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/power/supply/charger-manager.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/charger-manager.c
>>> @@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ static int check_charging_duration(struct
>>> charger_manager *cm)
>>> duration = curr - cm->charging_start_time;
>>>
>>> if (duration > desc->charging_max_duration_ms) {
>>> - dev_info(cm->dev, "Charging duration exceed %ums\n",
>>> + dev_info(cm->dev, "Charging duration exceeds %ums\n",
>>> desc->charging_max_duration_ms);
>>> ret = true;
>>> }
>>> @@ -472,8 +472,8 @@ static int check_charging_duration(struct
>>> charger_manager *cm)
>>> duration = curr - cm->charging_end_time;
>>>
>>> if (duration > desc->charging_max_duration_ms) {
>>> - dev_info(cm->dev, "Discharging duration exceed %ums\n",
>>> - desc->discharging_max_duration_ms);
>>> + dev_info(cm->dev, "Charging duration exceeds %ums\n",
>>> + desc->charging_max_duration_ms);
>>> ret = true;
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It looks to me like the second block (else if) should be about discharging,
>> not charging, more like Colin King's patch had it:
>>
>
> I had the same impression for a moment, but what makes me think this is
> more about charging than discharging, is this line:
>
> 471 } else if (cm->battery_status ==
> POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_NOT_CHARGING) {
>
> which was introduced by the same commit:
>
> e132fc6bb89b ("power: supply: charger-manager: Make decisions focussed on
> battery status")
>
> let's find out... :)
It's a 50/50 bet :-)
>
> Thanks
> --
> Gustavo
>
