On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 11:22:28AM +0530, kajoljain wrote: SNIP
> > Hi Jiri, > The change looks good to me. I tried with adding this patch on top of > your perf/metric branch. It did resolve the issue of not printing > all chips data. And now I can see proper values for hv-24x7 metric events. > > I was also trying by adding new metric using the feature added in this > patchset with something like this: > > diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/powerpc/power9/nest_metrics.json > b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/powerpc/power9/nest_metrics.json > index 8383a37647ad..dfe4bd63b587 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/powerpc/power9/nest_metrics.json > +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/powerpc/power9/nest_metrics.json > @@ -16,6 +16,11 @@ > "MetricName": "PowerBUS_Frequency", > "ScaleUnit": "2.5e-7GHz" > }, > + { > + "MetricExpr": "Memory_WR_BW_Chip + Memory_RD_BW_Chip", > + "MetricName": "Total_Memory_BW", > + "ScaleUnit": "1.6e-2MB" > + }, hum, we'll need special case this.. because Memory_WR_BW_Chip will unwind to Memory_WR_BW_Chip_[01] and Total_Memory_BW is not aware of that.. what's the expected behaviour in here? have Total_Memory_BW_[01] for each runtime arg? I think this will need to come on top of this changes, it's already too big thanks, jirka > > I guess as we have dependency on '?' symbol, I am not able to see all chips > data for Total_Memory_BW. > I am not sure if Its expected behavior? > > This is what I am getting: > > [root@ltc-zz189-lp4 perf]# ./perf stat --metric-only -M > Total_Memory_BW,Memory_WR_BW_Chip,Memory_RD_BW_Chip -I 1000 -C 0 > # time MB Total_Memory_BW MB Memory_RD_BW_Chip_1 MB > Memory_WR_BW_Chip_1 MB Memory_WR_BW_Chip_0 MB Memory_RD_BW_Chip_0 > 1.000067388 36.4 0.2 > 36.3 65.0 72.1 > 2.000374276 36.2 0.3 > 35.9 65.4 77.9 > 3.000543202 36.3 0.3 > 36.0 68.7 81.2 > 4.000702855 36.3 0.3 > 36.0 70.9 93.3 > 5.000856837 36.0 0.2 > 35.8 67.4 81.5 > ^C 5.367865273 13.2 0.1 > 13.1 23.5 28.3 > Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 0': > 194.4 1.3 193.1 > 361.0 434.3 > 5.368039176 seconds time elapsed > > We can only get single chip data's sum in Total_Memory_BW. Please let me know > if I am missing something. SNIP