On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 3:19 AM Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balle...@collabora.com> wrote: > > Hi Brian, > > Thank you for your patch, I'll take a look soon but I'd like to ask if you can > join the discussion with this patchset [1], specially this one [2]. We're > trying > to match EC errors with standard linux kernel errors because we think can be > helpful. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/cover/1276734/ > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1276738/
Hi Enric, Thanks, I'll do that. I do wonder sometimes how non-maintainers should best support "community" around these things, for subsystems that don't have a dedicated mailing list and are therefore sent only to maintainers + LKML-fire-hose. I could probably subscribe to LKML and filter it, but something tells me my mailbox will still manage to explode somehow... Anyway, I digress. Other than perhaps taking a lesson not to propagate -ENOTSUPP, I don't think this series should block on that, as this is a bugfix IMO. Regards, Brian
