On Sat, 2020-07-18 at 17:29 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Drop the repeated word "for" in a comment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
> Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: Darren Hart <[email protected]>
> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <[email protected]>
> ---
> This description could still use some better wording.
I will fix the wording in a follow up patch.
> include/uapi/linux/isst_if.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- linux-next-20200717.orig/include/uapi/linux/isst_if.h
> +++ linux-next-20200717/include/uapi/linux/isst_if.h
> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ struct isst_if_cpu_maps {
> * @logical_cpu: Logical CPU number to get target PCI device.
> * @reg: PUNIT register offset
> * @value: For write operation value to write and for
> - * for read placeholder read value
> + * read placeholder read value
> *
> * Structure to specify read/write data to PUNIT registers.
> */
