On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 15-07-20, 07:32, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > > > > On 14-07-20, 15:50, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1 > > > > kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with > > > > niggly little warnings. > > > > > > > > After these patches are applied, the build system no longer > > > > complains about any W=0 nor W=1 level warnings in drivers/cpufreq. > > > > > > And you need to rebase this stuff of pm/linux-next, as there are some > > > changes in cpufreq.c there. > > > > It's based on the latest -next. Is pm/linux-next in -next? > > Yes it is. Actually my bad, I based it on my next which didn't had > pm/linux-next :)
No problem. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
