On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 14-07-20, 15:50, Lee Jones wrote: > > This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1 > > kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with > > niggly little warnings. > > > > After these patches are applied, the build system no longer > > complains about any W=0 nor W=1 level warnings in drivers/cpufreq. > > And you need to rebase this stuff of pm/linux-next, as there are some > changes in cpufreq.c there.
It's based on the latest -next. Is pm/linux-next in -next? -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
