On 2020-07-07 05:37, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopher...@intel.com>
>
> An SGX runtime must be aware of the exceptions, which happen inside an
> enclave. Introduce a vDSO call that wraps EENTER/ERESUME cycle and returns
> the CPU exception back to the caller exactly when it happens.
>
> Kernel fixups the exception information to RDI, RSI and RDX. The SGX call
> vDSO handler fills this information to the user provided buffer or
> alternatively trigger user provided callback at the time of the exception.
>
> The calling convention is custom and does not follow System V x86-64 ABI.
>
> Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net>
> Acked-by: Jethro Beekman <jet...@fortanix.com>
> Tested-by: Jethro Beekman <jet...@fortanix.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopher...@intel.com>
> Co-developed-by: Cedric Xing <cedric.x...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Cedric Xing <cedric.x...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakki...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/entry/vdso/Makefile | 2 +
> arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso.lds.S | 1 +
> arch/x86/entry/vdso/vsgx_enter_enclave.S | 131 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/include/asm/enclu.h | 8 ++
> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/sgx.h | 98 +++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 240 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/entry/vdso/vsgx_enter_enclave.S
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/enclu.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/Makefile b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/Makefile
> index ebe82b7aecda..f71ad5ebd0c4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/Makefile
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ VDSO32-$(CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION) := y
> vobjs-y := vdso-note.o vclock_gettime.o vgetcpu.o
> vobjs32-y := vdso32/note.o vdso32/system_call.o vdso32/sigreturn.o
> vobjs32-y += vdso32/vclock_gettime.o
> +vobjs-$(VDSO64-y) += vsgx_enter_enclave.o
>
> # files to link into kernel
> obj-y += vma.o extable.o
> @@ -100,6 +101,7 @@ $(vobjs): KBUILD_CFLAGS := $(filter-out
> $(GCC_PLUGINS_CFLAGS) $(RETPOLINE_CFLAGS
> CFLAGS_REMOVE_vclock_gettime.o = -pg
> CFLAGS_REMOVE_vdso32/vclock_gettime.o = -pg
> CFLAGS_REMOVE_vgetcpu.o = -pg
> +CFLAGS_REMOVE_vsgx_enter_enclave.o = -pg
>
> #
> # X32 processes use x32 vDSO to access 64bit kernel data.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso.lds.S b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso.lds.S
> index 36b644e16272..4bf48462fca7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso.lds.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso.lds.S
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ VERSION {
> __vdso_time;
> clock_getres;
> __vdso_clock_getres;
> + __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave;
> local: *;
> };
> }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vsgx_enter_enclave.S
> b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vsgx_enter_enclave.S
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..be7e467e1efb
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vsgx_enter_enclave.S
> @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +
> +#include <linux/linkage.h>
> +#include <asm/export.h>
> +#include <asm/errno.h>
> +#include <asm/enclu.h>
> +
> +#include "extable.h"
> +
> +#define EX_LEAF 0*8
> +#define EX_TRAPNR 0*8+4
> +#define EX_ERROR_CODE 0*8+6
> +#define EX_ADDRESS 1*8
> +
> +.code64
> +.section .text, "ax"
> +
> +SYM_FUNC_START(__vdso_sgx_enter_enclave)
> + /* Prolog */
> + .cfi_startproc
> + push %rbp
> + .cfi_adjust_cfa_offset 8
> + .cfi_rel_offset %rbp, 0
> + mov %rsp, %rbp
> + .cfi_def_cfa_register %rbp
> + push %rbx
> + .cfi_rel_offset %rbx, -8
> +
> + mov %ecx, %eax
> +.Lenter_enclave:
> + /* EENTER <= leaf <= ERESUME */
> + cmp $EENTER, %eax
> + jb .Linvalid_leaf
> + cmp $ERESUME, %eax
> + ja .Linvalid_leaf
> +
> + /* Load TCS and AEP */
> + mov 0x10(%rbp), %rbx
> + lea .Lasync_exit_pointer(%rip), %rcx
> +
> + /* Single ENCLU serving as both EENTER and AEP (ERESUME) */
> +.Lasync_exit_pointer:
> +.Lenclu_eenter_eresume:
> + encluAfter thinking about this some more, I'd like to come back to this setup. Prior discussion at https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/11/2/597 . I hope I'm not derailing the discussion so much as to delay the patch set :( I previously mentioned “Userspace may want fine-grained control over enclave scheduling” as a reason userspace may want to specify a different AEP, but gave a bad example. Here's a better example: If I'm running my enclave in an M:N threading model (where M user threads run N TCSs, with N > M), an AEX is a good oppurtunity to switch contexts. Yes, I could implement this with alarm() or so, but that adds overhead while missing out on a lot of opportunities for context switching. -- Jethro Beekman | Fortanix
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
