On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 07:36:26AM -0700, Tom Rix wrote: > > > @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ static void cci_pci_free_irq(struct pci_dev *pcidev) > > #define PCIE_DEVICE_ID_PF_INT_5_X 0xBCBD > > #define PCIE_DEVICE_ID_PF_INT_6_X 0xBCC0 > > #define PCIE_DEVICE_ID_PF_DSC_1_X 0x09C4 > > +#define PCIE_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_PAC_N3000 0x0B30 > > My point about consistency. These are all intel and all should have their > pf parts removed. > > #define PCIE_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_INT_5_X 0xBCBD > #define PCIE_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_INT_6_X 0xBCC0 > #define PCIE_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_DSC_1_X 0x09C4 > > Let's revisit this for the d5005.
I agree that we should be consistent on the naming. I think we could reconsider the naming of previous cards and submit a new patch for them. > > trix >
