From: Dick Kennedy <dick.kenn...@broadcom.com>

commit f809da6db68a8be49e317f0ccfbced1af9258839 upstream.

Implementation of a previous patch added a condition to an if check that
always end up with the if test being true. Execution of the else clause was
inadvertently negated.  The additional condition check was incorrect and
unnecessary after the other modifications had been done in that patch.

Remove the check from the if series.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200501214310.91713-5-jsmart2...@gmail.com
Fixes: b95b21193c85 ("scsi: lpfc: Fix loss of remote port after devloss due to 
lack of RPIs")
Cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org> # v5.4+
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <h...@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Dick Kennedy <dick.kenn...@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <jsmart2...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.peter...@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_ct.c |    1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_ct.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_ct.c
@@ -462,7 +462,6 @@ lpfc_prep_node_fc4type(struct lpfc_vport
        struct lpfc_nodelist *ndlp;
 
        if ((vport->port_type != LPFC_NPIV_PORT) ||
-           (fc4_type == FC_TYPE_FCP) ||
            !(vport->ct_flags & FC_CT_RFF_ID) || !vport->cfg_restrict_login) {
 
                ndlp = lpfc_setup_disc_node(vport, Did);


Reply via email to