Hi Adrian, On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 7:58 PM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > On 6/5/20 5:59 PM, Rich Felker wrote: > >> Ah, sorry, I missed that. You're right, it should probably go through > >> someone else's tree then. > > > > Do you know if it's needed to un-break sh4? If so we should push to > > get whoever has jurisdiction over it to include it; otherwise I'm > > indifferent.
I think the above is about the asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h patch? https://marc.info/?l=linux-sh&m=158429470221261&w=2 That one falls under Arnd's jurisdiction. And AFAIUC, it matters for recent binutils only? So Arnd should know. > No, the patch is only necessary when enabling Infiniband support with > CONFIG_INFINIBAND_USER_ACCESS enabled. > > However, according to Geert, every architecture is supposed to have > 64-bit get_user() these days, therefore my patch is required anyways, > but it's not an acute problem. This is about a different patch. Still a build failure, but who cares about Infiniband? (I still care more about SH ;-) Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
