There is no way to proceed when requested register could not be searched in arm64_ftr_reg[]. Requesting for a non present register would be an error as well. Hence lets just BUG_ON() when the search fails in get_arm64_ftr_reg() rather than checking for return value and doing the same in some individual callers.
But there are some callers that dont BUG_ON() upon search failure. It adds an argument 'failsafe' that provides required switch between callers based on whether they could proceed or not. Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <w...@kernel.org> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poul...@arm.com> Cc: Mark Brown <broo...@kernel.org> Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khand...@arm.com> --- Applies on next-20200518 that has recent cpufeature changes from Will. arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 26 +++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c index bc5048f152c1..62767cc540c3 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c @@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ static int search_cmp_ftr_reg(const void *id, const void *regp) * - NULL on failure. It is upto the caller to decide * the impact of a failure. */ -static struct arm64_ftr_reg *get_arm64_ftr_reg(u32 sys_id) +static struct arm64_ftr_reg *get_arm64_ftr_reg(u32 sys_id, bool failsafe) { const struct __ftr_reg_entry *ret; @@ -568,6 +568,13 @@ static struct arm64_ftr_reg *get_arm64_ftr_reg(u32 sys_id) search_cmp_ftr_reg); if (ret) return ret->reg; + /* + * This can not really proceed when the search fails. + * Requesting for a non existent register search will + * also be an error in itself. Error out when not + * called with fail safe request. + */ + BUG_ON(!failsafe); return NULL; } @@ -630,9 +637,7 @@ static void __init init_cpu_ftr_reg(u32 sys_reg, u64 new) u64 valid_mask = 0; const struct arm64_ftr_bits *ftrp; - struct arm64_ftr_reg *reg = get_arm64_ftr_reg(sys_reg); - - BUG_ON(!reg); + struct arm64_ftr_reg *reg = get_arm64_ftr_reg(sys_reg, false); for (ftrp = reg->ftr_bits; ftrp->width; ftrp++) { u64 ftr_mask = arm64_ftr_mask(ftrp); @@ -760,9 +765,8 @@ static void update_cpu_ftr_reg(struct arm64_ftr_reg *reg, u64 new) static int check_update_ftr_reg(u32 sys_id, int cpu, u64 val, u64 boot) { - struct arm64_ftr_reg *regp = get_arm64_ftr_reg(sys_id); + struct arm64_ftr_reg *regp = get_arm64_ftr_reg(sys_id, false); - BUG_ON(!regp); update_cpu_ftr_reg(regp, val); if ((boot & regp->strict_mask) == (val & regp->strict_mask)) return 0; @@ -774,10 +778,7 @@ static int check_update_ftr_reg(u32 sys_id, int cpu, u64 val, u64 boot) static void relax_cpu_ftr_reg(u32 sys_id, int field) { const struct arm64_ftr_bits *ftrp; - struct arm64_ftr_reg *regp = get_arm64_ftr_reg(sys_id); - - if (WARN_ON(!regp)) - return; + struct arm64_ftr_reg *regp = get_arm64_ftr_reg(sys_id, false); for (ftrp = regp->ftr_bits; ftrp->width; ftrp++) { if (ftrp->shift == field) { @@ -959,10 +960,9 @@ void update_cpu_features(int cpu, u64 read_sanitised_ftr_reg(u32 id) { - struct arm64_ftr_reg *regp = get_arm64_ftr_reg(id); + struct arm64_ftr_reg *regp = get_arm64_ftr_reg(id, false); /* We shouldn't get a request for an unsupported register */ - BUG_ON(!regp); return regp->sys_val; } @@ -2565,7 +2565,7 @@ static int emulate_sys_reg(u32 id, u64 *valp) if (sys_reg_CRm(id) == 0) return emulate_id_reg(id, valp); - regp = get_arm64_ftr_reg(id); + regp = get_arm64_ftr_reg(id, true); if (regp) *valp = arm64_ftr_reg_user_value(regp); else -- 2.20.1