On 11/05/2020 03:53, Pavankumar Kondeti wrote:
> The intention of commit 96e74ebf8d59 ("sched/debug: Add task uclamp
> values to SCHED_DEBUG procfs") was to print requested and effective
> task uclamp values. The requested values printed are read from p->uclamp,
> which holds the last effective values. Fix this by printing the values
> from p->uclamp_req.
>
> Fixes: 96e74ebf8d59 ("sched/debug: Add task uclamp values to SCHED_DEBUG
> procfs")
> Tested-and-reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schnei...@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Pavankumar Kondeti <pkond...@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>
> V2: Added "requested" prefix (suggested by Valentin)
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggem...@arm.com>
>
> kernel/sched/debug.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
> index a562df5..77ecebd 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
> @@ -948,8 +948,8 @@ void proc_sched_show_task(struct task_struct *p, struct
> pid_namespace *ns,
> P(se.avg.util_est.enqueued);
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK
> - __PS("uclamp.min", p->uclamp[UCLAMP_MIN].value);
> - __PS("uclamp.max", p->uclamp[UCLAMP_MAX].value);
> + __PS("requested uclamp.min", p->uclamp_req[UCLAMP_MIN].value);
> + __PS("requested uclamp.max", p->uclamp_req[UCLAMP_MAX].value);
> __PS("effective uclamp.min", uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MIN));
> __PS("effective uclamp.max", uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MAX));
> #endif
