On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 11:24:41PM -0700, Ben Greear wrote: > jamal wrote: > > > > > Not to stray from the subject, Ben's effort is still needed. I think real > > numbers are useful instead of claims like it "displayed faster" > > A single #define near the top of the patch will turn it on/off, so > benchmarking should be fairly easy. Please suggest benchmarks you > consider valid. The only issue I know was the long delay in ifconfig. If that's fixed I see nothing else that would be worth benchmarking. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device ... Ben Greear
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device ... Matti Aarnio
- Re: [PATCH] hashed dev... jamal
- Re: [PATCH] hashed dev... Matti Aarnio
- Re: [PATCH] hashed dev... jamal
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet ... Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT ... jamal
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does ... Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does ... Ben Greear
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (D... Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does ... David S. Miller
- [little bit OT] ip _IS_ _NOT_ ifcon... Henning P. Schmiedehausen
- Re: [little bit OT] ip _IS_ _NO... David S. Miller
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (D... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device looku... jamal
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device ... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (D... jamal
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device looku... Gleb Natapov
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device looku... Ben Greear