jamal wrote: > > Not to stray from the subject, Ben's effort is still needed. I think real > numbers are useful instead of claims like it "displayed faster" A single #define near the top of the patch will turn it on/off, so benchmarking should be fairly easy. Please suggest benchmarks you consider valid. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.candelatech.com Author of ScryMUD: scry.wanfear.com 4444 (Released under GPL) http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device looku... jamal
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device ... Ben Greear
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device ... Matti Aarnio
- Re: [PATCH] hashed dev... jamal
- Re: [PATCH] hashed dev... Matti Aarnio
- Re: [PATCH] hashed dev... jamal
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet ... Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT ... jamal
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does ... Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does ... Ben Greear
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (D... Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does ... David S. Miller
- [little bit OT] ip _IS_ _NOT_ ifcon... Henning P. Schmiedehausen
- Re: [little bit OT] ip _IS_ _NO... David S. Miller
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (D... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device looku... jamal
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device ... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (D... jamal
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device looku... Gleb Natapov