On 4/29/20 11:11 PM, Zhen Lei wrote:
> Whether swap_slot_cache_initialized is true or false,
> __reenable_swap_slots_cache() is always called. To make this meaning
> clear, leave only one call to __reenable_swap_slots_cache(). This also
> make it clearer what extra needs be done when swap_slot_cache_initialized
> is false.
> 
> No functional change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leiz...@huawei.com>

Acked-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.c...@linux.intel.com>

> ---
>  mm/swap_slots.c | 22 ++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/swap_slots.c b/mm/swap_slots.c
> index 01609b5f0c55..b40394473a3c 100644
> --- a/mm/swap_slots.c
> +++ b/mm/swap_slots.c
> @@ -240,21 +240,19 @@ static int free_slot_cache(unsigned int cpu)
>  
>  int enable_swap_slots_cache(void)
>  {
> -     int ret = 0;
> -
>       mutex_lock(&swap_slots_cache_enable_mutex);
> -     if (swap_slot_cache_initialized) {
> -             __reenable_swap_slots_cache();
> -             goto out_unlock;
> -     }
> +     if (!swap_slot_cache_initialized) {
> +             int ret;
>  
> -     ret = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, "swap_slots_cache",
> -                             alloc_swap_slot_cache, free_slot_cache);
> -     if (WARN_ONCE(ret < 0, "Cache allocation failed (%s), operating "
> -                            "without swap slots cache.\n", __func__))
> -             goto out_unlock;
> +             ret = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, "swap_slots_cache",
> +                                     alloc_swap_slot_cache, free_slot_cache);
> +             if (WARN_ONCE(ret < 0, "Cache allocation failed (%s), operating 
> "
> +                                    "without swap slots cache.\n", __func__))
> +                     goto out_unlock;
> +
> +             swap_slot_cache_initialized = true;
> +     }
>  
> -     swap_slot_cache_initialized = true;
>       __reenable_swap_slots_cache();
>  out_unlock:
>       mutex_unlock(&swap_slots_cache_enable_mutex);
> 

Reply via email to