On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 03:45:09 +1000 Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > mm-use-pagevec-to-rotate-reclaimable-page.patch > > mm-use-pagevec-to-rotate-reclaimable-page-fix.patch > > mm-use-pagevec-to-rotate-reclaimable-page-fix-2.patch > > mm-use-pagevec-to-rotate-reclaimable-page-fix-function-declaration.patch > > mm-use-pagevec-to-rotate-reclaimable-page-fix-bug-at-include-linux-mmh220.p > >atch > > mm-use-pagevec-to-rotate-reclaimable-page-kill-redundancy-in-rotate_reclaim > >able_page.patch > > mm-use-pagevec-to-rotate-reclaimable-page-move_tail_pages-into-lru_add_drai > >n.patch > > > > I guess I'll merge this. Would be nice to have wider perfromance testing > > but I guess it'll be easy enough to undo. > > Care to give it one more round through -mm? Is it easy enough to > keep? Yup. Nobody has done much with that code in ages. > I haven't had a chance to review it, which I'd like to do at some > point (and I don't think it would hurt to have a bit more testing). Sure. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
