Ah, sorry. I was thinking of the 'port' property and replying to that.

assigned clocks are definitely being removed.

On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 10:25, Marco Felsch <m.fel...@pengutronix.de> wrote:
>
> On 20-04-28 09:55, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 05:13:42PM +0200, Robert Foss wrote:
> > > On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 at 18:21, Marco Felsch <m.fel...@pengutronix.de> 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 20-04-15 11:07, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 01:08:14PM +0200, Robert Foss wrote:
> > > > > > From: Dongchun Zhu <dongchun....@mediatek.com>
>
> ...
>
> > > > > > +  clock-names:
> > > > > > +    description:
> > > > > > +      Input clock for the sensor.
> > > > > > +    items:
> > > > > > +      - const: xvclk
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +  assigned-clocks:
> > > > > > +    description:
> > > > > > +      Input clock for the sensor.
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +  assigned-clock-rates:
> > > > > > +    description:
> > > > > > +      Frequency of the xvclk clock in Hertz.
> > > > >
> > > > > These 2 should have a 'maxItems: 1'
> > > >
> > > > Don't know why those properties are needed here.. IMHO this shouldn't be
> > > > part of the binding or at least it should be optional and not required.
> > > > All we need is the clocks and the clock-names property.
> > >
> > > Thanks Marco, I'll make it optional for the next revision.
> >
> > Well, the whole discussion we had was about removing them entirely?
>
> +1 from my side. It is part of the system integration and not part of
> this device.
>
> Regards,
>   Marco
>
> > Maxime

Reply via email to