Hi Peter, On 14-Oct 16:52, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > The energy aware schedutil patches remimded me this was still pending. > > On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 10:47:25AM +0100, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > > Hi Peter, Vincent, > > is there anything different I can do on this? > > I think both Vincent and me are basically fine with the patch, it was > the Changelog/explanation for it that sat uneasy. > > Specifically I think the 'confusion' around the PELT invariance stuff > doesn't help. > > I think that if you present it simply as making util_est directly follow > upward motion and only decay on downward -- and the rationale for it -- > then it should be fine.
Ok, I'll update the commit message to remove the PELT related ambiguity and post a new version soon. Cheers, Patrick -- #include <best/regards.h> Patrick Bellasi
