On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 10:03 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> wrote: > > On 18-10-19, 09:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Well, the policy is going away, so the governor has been stopped for > > it already. Even if the limit is updated, it will not be used anyway, > > so why bother with updating it? > > The hardware will be programmed to run on that frequency before the > policy exits,
How exactly? The policy is inactive, so refresh_frequency_limits() won't even run cpufreq_set_policy() for it. > so I will say it will be used and the constraint will be > satisfied. And so I had that view.
