On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Rik van Riel wrote: > Also, you do not want the writer to block on writing out buffers > if bdflush could write them out asynchronously while the dirty > buffer producer can work on in the background. flush_dirty_buffers() do not wait on the buffers written to get clean. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12 ll_rw_block er... Chris Mason
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12 ll_rw_block er... Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12 ll_rw_block er... Alexander Viro
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12 ll_rw_block er... Chris Mason
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12 ll_rw_block er... Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12 ll_rw_block er... Daniel Phillips
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12 ll_rw_block er... Chris Mason
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12 ll_rw_block er... Chris Mason
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12 ll_rw_block er... Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12 ll_rw_block er... Rik van Riel
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12 ll_rw_block er... Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12 ll_rw_block er... Rik van Riel
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12 ll_rw_block er... Chris Mason
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12 ll_rw_block er... Juergen Schneider