On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Chris Mason wrote: > > Here's the latest version of the patch, against 2.4.0. The > biggest open issues are what to do with bdflush, since > page_launder could do everything bdflush does. I think we want to remove flush_dirty_buffers() from bdflush. While we are trying to be smart and do write clustering at the ->writepage operation, flush_dirty_buffers() is "dumb" and will interfere with the write clustering. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12 ll_rw_block er... Chris Mason
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12 ll_rw_blo... Daniel Phillips
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12 ll_rw... Chris Mason
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12 l... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test... Chris Mason
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test... Daniel Phillips
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test... Chris Mason
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test... Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test... Alexander Viro
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test... Chris Mason
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test... Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test... Daniel Phillips
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test... Chris Mason
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test... Chris Mason
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test... Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test... Rik van Riel
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test... Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test... Rik van Riel
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test... Chris Mason
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test... Juergen Schneider