Hi Andy, On 9/28/07, Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That is unfair. Every time we discuss it I state that I disagree that > hiding mostly useful tests is a good thing. I would love the tests to > be 100% accurate, but if I removed all the tests that can false positive > I would literally have none. There is a balance to be struck and we > have significantly different ideas on where the balance is.
Are you disagreeing with the numbers Ingo posted? 25,000 false positives for the kernel is beyond silly... Existing conventions should matter a lot and the default configuration for a static code checker should really be 100%. So why not hide the potentially useful warnings under -Wtoo-strict or similar command line option? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
