On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 10:46:42AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 14:21:38 +0100 Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 12:49:35PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > * Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 11:39:02AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > > > [bunfight] > > > > oy, knock it off.
Really not trying to have a bunfight, honest. > > Anyhow. I have already added a --check/--no-check option which controls > > -strict? > > > the more subjective tests which will be in the next release; though its > > likely the option name will be something more useful by then. > > > > The only question is whether this should default to on. You are voting > > off. I personally think on. > > > > Andrew? Randy? Joel? > > > > off, I'd say. That way people are more likely to use it. Or, more > accurately, will have less excuses to not use it. Ok, then I think thats 2 for on and 3 for off. So off it is. I was tending towards --subjective for the tests which are err more subjective. --strict is good too. Perhaps I'll put both of those in as aliases. I will also review the tests which are warnings and checks (subjective) and see if any are now miss-categorised. -apw - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
