On 20.09.2019 15:29, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> Currently there is a small gap between fetching pointer, calling
> kvfree and assign its value to nil. In current callgraph it is
> not a problem (since memcg_free_shrinker_maps is running from
> memcg_alloc_shrinker_maps and mem_cgroup_css_free only) still
> this looks suspicious and we can easily eliminate the gap at all.
> 
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <han...@cmpxchg.org>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mho...@kernel.org>
> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov....@gmail.com>
> Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktk...@virtuozzo.com>
> Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcu...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Index: linux-tip.git/mm/memcontrol.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-tip.git.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ linux-tip.git/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -364,9 +364,9 @@ static void memcg_free_shrinker_maps(str
>       for_each_node(nid) {
>               pn = mem_cgroup_nodeinfo(memcg, nid);
>               map = rcu_dereference_protected(pn->shrinker_map, true);
> +             rcu_assign_pointer(pn->shrinker_map, NULL);
>               if (map)
>                       kvfree(map);
> -             rcu_assign_pointer(pn->shrinker_map, NULL);
>       }
>  }

The current scheme is following. We allocate shrinker_map in css_online,
while normal freeing happens in css_free. The NULLifying of pointer is needed
in case of "abnormal freeing", when memcg_free_shrinker_maps() is called
from memcg_alloc_shrinker_maps(). The NULLifying guarantees, we won't free
pn->shrinker_map twice.

There are no races or problems with kvfree() and rcu_assign_pointer() order,
because of nobody can reference shrinker_map before memcg is online.

In case of this rcu_assign_pointer() confuses, we may just remove is from
the function, and call it only on css_free. Something like the below:

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 1c4c08b45e44..454303c3aa0f 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -372,7 +372,6 @@ static void memcg_free_shrinker_maps(struct mem_cgroup 
*memcg)
                map = rcu_dereference_protected(pn->shrinker_map, true);
                if (map)
                        kvfree(map);
-               rcu_assign_pointer(pn->shrinker_map, NULL);
        }
 }
 
@@ -389,7 +388,6 @@ static int memcg_alloc_shrinker_maps(struct mem_cgroup 
*memcg)
        for_each_node(nid) {
                map = kvzalloc(sizeof(*map) + size, GFP_KERNEL);
                if (!map) {
-                       memcg_free_shrinker_maps(memcg);
                        ret = -ENOMEM;
                        break;
                }

Reply via email to