On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 03:10:21PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > Then the "reverse alternatives" feature wouldn't be needed anyway.
The intent was to have the default, most-used version be there at
build-time, obviating the need to patch. Therefore on those old !ERMS
CPUs we'll end up doing rep;stosb before patching, which is supported,
albeit slow.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
