On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 10:00:23AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 16:34:15 +0300 > Sakari Ailus <sakari.ai...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > Add a note warning of re-use of obsolete %pf or %pF extensions. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ai...@linux.intel.com> > > Cc: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> > > Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rost...@goodmis.org>
Yes, I'll add that for v8. > > > --- > > lib/vsprintf.c | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c > > index b00b57f9f911f..df59818537b52 100644 > > --- a/lib/vsprintf.c > > +++ b/lib/vsprintf.c > > @@ -2008,6 +2008,8 @@ static char *kobject_string(char *buf, char *end, > > void *ptr, > > * - 'S' For symbolic direct pointers (or function descriptors) with offset > > * - 's' For symbolic direct pointers (or function descriptors) without > > offset > > * - '[Ss]R' as above with __builtin_extract_return_addr() translation > > + * - '[Ff]' Obsolete an now unsupported extension for printing direct > > pointers > > "Obsolete and now"? Fixed. -- Sakari Ailus sakari.ai...@linux.intel.com
