On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 03:13:26PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Sep 2019, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 02:11:29PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> 
> > > To this end, the LKMM imposes three extra restrictions, together
> > > called the "plain-coherence" axiom because of their resemblance to the
> > > coherency rules:
> > > 
> > >   If R and W conflict and it is possible to link R to W by one
> > >   of the xb* sequences listed above, then W ->rfe R is not
> > >   allowed (i.e., a load cannot read from a store that it
> > >   executes before, even if one or both is plain).
> > > 
> > >   If W and R conflict and it is possible to link W to R by one
> > >   of the vis sequences listed above, then R ->fre W is not
> > >   allowed (i.e., if a store is visible to a load then the load
> > >   must read from that store or one coherence-after it).
> > > 
> > >   If W and W' conflict and it is possible to link W to W' by one
> > >   of the vis sequences listed above, then W' ->co W is not
> > >   allowed (i.e., if one store is visible to another then it must
> > >   come after in the coherence order).
> 
> > I will need to read this last section again.  Perhaps more than once.  ;-)
> 
> I decided this part could use some improvement.  Here is the updated
> text:
> 
> 
> To this end, the LKMM imposes three extra restrictions, together
> called the "plain-coherence" axiom because of their resemblance to the
> rules used by the operational model to ensure cache coherence (that
> is, the rules governing the memory subsystem's choice of a store to
> satisfy a load request and its determination of where a store will
> fall in the coherence order):
> 
>       If R and W conflict and it is possible to link R to W by one
>       of the xb* sequences listed above, then W ->rfe R is not
>       allowed (i.e., a load cannot read from a store that it
>       executes before, even if one or both is plain).
> 
>       If W and R conflict and it is possible to link W to R by one
>       of the vis sequences listed above, then R ->fre W is not
>       allowed (i.e., if a store is visible to a load then the load
>       must read from that store or one coherence-after it).
> 
>       If W and W' conflict and it is possible to link W to W' by one
>       of the vis sequences listed above, then W' ->co W is not
>       allowed (i.e., if one store is visible to a second then the
>       second must come after the first in the coherence order).

These look good to me!

                                                        Thanx, Paul

Reply via email to