[ Upstream commit 49f17c26c123b60fd1c74629eef077740d16ffc2 ]

Since resources can be removed, locking should ensure that the resource
is not removed while accessing it.  However, find_next_iomem_res() does
not hold the lock while copying the data of the resource.

Keep holding the lock while the data is copied.  While at it, change the
return value to a more informative value.  It is disregarded by the
callers.

[[email protected]: fix find_next_iomem_res() documentation]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Fixes: ff3cc952d3f00 ("resource: Add remove_resource interface")
Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Toshi Kani <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/resource.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
index 38b8d11c9eaf4..bce773cc5e416 100644
--- a/kernel/resource.c
+++ b/kernel/resource.c
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(release_resource);
  *
  * If a resource is found, returns 0 and *res is overwritten with the part
  * of the resource that's within [start..end]; if none is found, returns
- * -1.
+ * -ENODEV.  Returns -EINVAL for invalid parameters.
  *
  * This function walks the whole tree and not just first level children
  * unless @first_level_children_only is true.
@@ -359,16 +359,16 @@ static int find_next_iomem_res(resource_size_t start, 
resource_size_t end,
                        break;
        }
 
+       if (p) {
+               /* copy data */
+               res->start = max(start, p->start);
+               res->end = min(end, p->end);
+               res->flags = p->flags;
+               res->desc = p->desc;
+       }
+
        read_unlock(&resource_lock);
-       if (!p)
-               return -1;
-
-       /* copy data */
-       res->start = max(start, p->start);
-       res->end = min(end, p->end);
-       res->flags = p->flags;
-       res->desc = p->desc;
-       return 0;
+       return p ? 0 : -ENODEV;
 }
 
 static int __walk_iomem_res_desc(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
-- 
2.20.1



Reply via email to