Hi Greg,
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 03:04:48PM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote: > > > > But wait ... isn't that a statically-allocated kobject, which were > > supposed to be "naughty" in the first place? > > Yes it is, if you want to dynamically create it, please do. Sorry for being late to reply, but do you still want such a patch (i.e. convert static to dynamic allocation)? I read elsewhere on this thread that you'd merge Kamalesh's patch and fix it up to also use kobject_name() yourself. But it's a small/trivial driver, so I think just converting it to dynamic allocation right now itself (when we've noticed it already) is probably better (?) [ BTW I don't see the fix in your git trees or quilt queue. So I'll make a patch on top of 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 itself. ] Thanks, Satyam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
