On (22/09/07 14:11), Satyam Sharma didst pronounce: > > > -static volatile int kgdb_hwbreak_sstep[NR_CPUS]; > > +volatile int kgdb_hwbreak_sstep[NR_CPUS]; > > That looks fishy to me. Why is it volatile-qualified?
It turned out that it was unnecessary. A follow-up patch removed the volatile and kept the static. > And does that > actually want to be a per-cpu var? > -- -- Mel Gorman Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
