On 9/10/19 8:11 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 04:23:11AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
This looks fine from the DMA POV. I'll let the x86 guys comment on the
rest.
Do we want to pick this series up for 5.4? Should I queue it up in
the dma-mapping tree?
Hi, Christoph
I think the DMA change is pretty uncontroversial.
There are still some questions about the x86 change: After digging a bit
deeper into the mm code I think Dave is correct about that we should
include the sme_me_mask in _PAGE_CHG_MASK.
I'll respin that patch and then I guess we need an ack from the x86 people.
Thanks,
Thomas
