On Sun, Sep 01, 2019 at 04:23:03PM +0200, Remi Pommarel wrote:
> advk_pcie_wait_pio() can be called while holding a spinlock (from
> pci_bus_read_config_dword()), then depends on jiffies in order to
> timeout while polling on PIO state registers. In the case the PIO
> transaction failed, the timeout will never happen and will also cause
> the cpu to stall.
> 
> This decrements a variable and wait instead of using jiffies.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Remi Pommarel <r...@triplefau.lt>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Murray <andrew.mur...@arm.com>

> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/pci-aardvark.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-aardvark.c 
> b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-aardvark.c
> index fc0fe4d4de49..1fa6d04ad7aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-aardvark.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-aardvark.c
> @@ -175,7 +175,8 @@
>       (PCIE_CONF_BUS(bus) | PCIE_CONF_DEV(PCI_SLOT(devfn))    | \
>        PCIE_CONF_FUNC(PCI_FUNC(devfn)) | PCIE_CONF_REG(where))
>  
> -#define PIO_TIMEOUT_MS                       1
> +#define PIO_RETRY_CNT                        10
> +#define PIO_RETRY_DELAY                      100 /* 100 us*/
>  
>  #define LINK_WAIT_MAX_RETRIES                10
>  #define LINK_WAIT_USLEEP_MIN         90000
> @@ -383,17 +384,16 @@ static void advk_pcie_check_pio_status(struct advk_pcie 
> *pcie)
>  static int advk_pcie_wait_pio(struct advk_pcie *pcie)
>  {
>       struct device *dev = &pcie->pdev->dev;
> -     unsigned long timeout;
> +     size_t i;
>  
> -     timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(PIO_TIMEOUT_MS);
> -
> -     while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
> +     for (i = 0; i < PIO_RETRY_CNT; ++i) {
>               u32 start, isr;
>  
>               start = advk_readl(pcie, PIO_START);
>               isr = advk_readl(pcie, PIO_ISR);
>               if (!start && isr)
>                       return 0;
> +             udelay(PIO_RETRY_DELAY);
>       }
>  
>       dev_err(dev, "config read/write timed out\n");
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 

Reply via email to