On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 02:52:40AM -0500, Jassi Brar wrote: > On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 2:37 AM Peng Fan <peng....@nxp.com> wrote:
[...] > > > > If I get your point correctly, > > On UP, both could not be active. On SMP, tx/rx could be both active, anyway > > this depends on secure firmware and Linux firmware design. > > > > Do you have any suggestions about arm,func-ids here? > > > I was thinking if this is just an instruction, why can't each channel > be represented as a controller, i.e, have exactly one func-id per > controller node. Define as many controllers as you need channels ? > I might have missed to follow this, but what's the advantage of doing so ? Which can't single controller instance deal with all the channels ? -- Regards, Sudeep
