> > Hi Ingo,
> >
> > I found an issue about the scheduler.
> > If you need a test case, please let me know.
> > Here is a patch.
> > [ ... ]
> > The new thread should be valid scheduler class before queuing.
> > This patch fixes to set the suitable scheduler class.
>
> Nice fix! It's a 2.6.23 must-have fix - i'll push it out into the
> scheduler tree. Thanks!
I think, the following approach would be a bit more appropriate
(the missing addition to the already existing "don't leak PI boosting prio"):
(not tested)
---
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index bc1a625..da2139e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -1646,6 +1646,8 @@ void sched_fork(struct task_struct *p, int clone_flags)
* Make sure we do not leak PI boosting priority to the child:
*/
p->prio = current->normal_prio;
+ if (!rt_prio(p->prio))
+ p->sched_class = &fair_sched_class;
#if defined(CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS) || defined(CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT)
if (likely(sched_info_on()))
---
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
